Skip to main content
Architectural and structural drawings spread across a desk

Capital Project Readiness & Execution Assessment

A defined four-to-six week engagement that tells an owner, board, or investor whether a project is positioned to be delivered — before major capital is committed.

The question this answers

Is this project positioned to succeed?

Not whether the project is a good idea, and not whether the team is working hard. Whether the thing as currently defined, funded, permitted, designed, procured, and governed can actually be built on the terms the owner is assuming.

The assessment is deliberately bounded. It runs on a fixed scope and a fixed fee, agreed in advance, and it ends with a document an owner can act on rather than a standing engagement.

What we examine

Sixteen dimensions, reviewed against the project as it actually stands today.

Project definition

What is actually being built, and is it settled.

Business and investment assumptions

The commercial case the project rests on.

Site readiness

Whether the site can carry the program as planned.

Power capacity and interconnection

Validated capacity, queue position, and energization path.

Water and utility capacity

Supply, discharge, and the constraints on both.

Permitting and entitlement

Sequence, dependencies, and the critical path through them.

Design status

Maturity, coordination, and readiness for release.

Capital budget

Basis, contingency structure, and exposure.

Schedule credibility

Whether the dates are derived or asserted.

Procurement and long-lead equipment

Order timing against the delivery window.

Delivery strategy

Contracting model and how risk is allocated by it.

Team structure

Who holds which decision, and whether anyone holds the whole.

Project controls

Cost, schedule, and change reporting that can be trusted.

Governance

Decision rights, escalation, and reporting to the board.

Risk allocation

Where risk actually sits versus where it is assumed to sit.

Operational readiness

What is required to run the asset once it exists.

What you receive

A single document, written for an executive audience, with the analysis behind it attached.

Executive readiness score

A defensible overall position, with the basis shown.

Critical risks

Ranked, with the consequence of each stated plainly.

Unresolved decisions

What the owner must decide, and by when.

Capital exposure

Where the budget is most likely to move, and why.

Schedule vulnerabilities

The dates that will not hold, and what drives them.

Utility and infrastructure constraints

Power, water, and interconnection limits on the plan.

Team deficiencies

Gaps in the delivery organization as currently constituted.

Governance weaknesses

Where decisions stall, or are made by the wrong party.

Recommended delivery structure

The contracting and organizational model we would advise.

Priority actions

What to do first, sequenced.

90-day implementation plan

A concrete plan for the first quarter after the review.

Who commissions it

The assessment is usually commissioned by whoever carries the consequence if the project underperforms.

  • Boards

    Directors who must approve a commitment and be able to explain the basis for it.

  • Investment committees

    Committees testing whether an execution plan supports the capital case.

  • Lenders

    Credit parties assessing delivery risk before or during a facility.

  • Private equity operating partners

    Operating teams underwriting a build inside a portfolio company.

  • Developers

    Sponsors who need an unconflicted read before committing to a delivery structure.

  • CFOs and General Counsel

    Executives carrying the financial and contractual exposure.

Scope and terms

Four to six weeks. Fixed fee, scoped in advance.

The duration reflects the work: document review, interviews across the project organization, independent analysis, and a drafted findings review with the commissioning party before the report is final.

The fee is fixed and agreed before the engagement begins. It is not published, because it is scoped to the project — the range between a single-site review and a multi-site program is wide enough that any published figure would mislead.

Common questions about the assessment

Discuss an Assessment

Tell us about the project and the decision it is attached to. We will tell you what a scoped assessment would cover.